Austin & Ors, Re Petition for Approval [2008] ScotCS CSOH_116 (13 August 2008)
The court held that the petitioners had demonstrated compelling practical difficulties in administering the trust under its original terms, due to outdated language, restrictive eligibility criteria, and changes in charitable practice and terminology. The court found that the proposed scheme did not alter the fundamental charitable objectives of the trust but modernized the means of achieving them. The cy-près jurisdiction was engaged, and the scheme was approved as expedient and justified by current circumstances.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSOH_116
- Parties
- Petitioners: Richard Keith Austin, WS; Donald Gilmour Sutherland, CA; Donald Bain, MB, BS; and Fiona Avril Patrick, BA Com as Trustees of the R S Macdonald Charitable Trust; Respondents: Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Approval of a Scheme for the Variation of Trust Purposes / Outer House, Court of Session – Opinion After Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Petition granted; scheme for variation of trust purposes approved.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Purposes, Cy Près Doctrine, Charitable Trust Administration, Interpretation of Trust Deeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Keith Austin, WS; Donald Gilmour Sutherland, CA; Donald Bain, MB, BS; and Fiona Avril Patrick, BA Com as Trustees of the R S Macdonald Charitable Trust
Petitioners
Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Petition for Approval of a Scheme for the Variation of Trust Purposes / Outer House, Court of Session – Opinion After Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the purposes of the RS Macdonald Charitable Trust should be varied under the court's cy-près jurisdiction to reflect modern circumstances and practice.
- 2 Whether the expressions 'spastics' and 'spastic conditions' in the Trust Deed should be updated or broadened in meaning.
- 3 Whether the requirement that beneficiaries operate in Scotland and have certain principal objects is unduly restrictive.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the petitioners had demonstrated compelling practical difficulties in administering the trust under its original terms, due to outdated language, restrictive eligibility criteria, and changes in charitable practice and terminology. The court found that the proposed scheme did not alter the fundamental charitable objectives of the trust but modernized the means of achieving them. The cy-près jurisdiction was engaged, and the scheme was approved as expedient and justified by current circumstances.
Court Disposition
Petition granted; scheme for variation of trust purposes approved.
Orders
- The purposes of the RS Macdonald Charitable Trust are varied in accordance with the scheme set out in the petition, including updated eligibility criteria and terminology.
- The administrative powers of the trustees are to be set out in greater detail and in accordance with current best practice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment