Veitoh'a Trustees v. Rutherford and Others [1913] ScotLR 150 (12 December 1913)
The will conferred an absolute, indefeasible right of fee on the two beneficiaries, and the direction to trustees to 'put not a shilling at risk' was merely a direction for safe investment, not a limitation to liferent. There being no essential trust purposes requiring retention, the beneficiaries were entitled to immediate payment of the residue equally.
- Citation
- [1913] ScotLR 150
- Parties
- First Parties: W. G. Turnbull and another, testamentary trustees of Reverend William Veitch; Second Parties: Mrs A. R. Turnbull or Rutherford and Mrs A. E. Rutherford or Bywater, with consent of their husbands; Third Parties: Mrs J. E. Turnbull or Brown and another, representatives of next-of-kin and heirs in mobilibus; Fourth Parties: W. G. Turnbull and others, surviving original trustee and representatives of deceased trustee
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1913
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
- Outcome
- First question and first branch of second question answered in the affirmative; remaining questions unnecessary or abandoned.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting, Liferent or Fee, Trustee Duties, Repugnancy of Trust Purposes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W. G. Turnbull and another, testamentary trustees of Reverend William Veitch
First Parties
Mrs A. R. Turnbull or Rutherford and Mrs A. E. Rutherford or Bywater, with consent of their husbands
Second Parties
Mrs J. E. Turnbull or Brown and another, representatives of next-of-kin and heirs in mobilibus
Third Parties
W. G. Turnbull and others, surviving original trustee and representatives of deceased trustee
Fourth Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the residue of the testator's estate vested in fee in the second parties or only as liferent.
- 2 Whether the direction to trustees to 'put not a shilling at risk' limited the beneficiaries' entitlement to liferent.
- 3 Whether the beneficiaries were entitled to immediate payment of the residue.
Ratio Decidendi
The will conferred an absolute, indefeasible right of fee on the two beneficiaries, and the direction to trustees to 'put not a shilling at risk' was merely a direction for safe investment, not a limitation to liferent. There being no essential trust purposes requiring retention, the beneficiaries were entitled to immediate payment of the residue equally.
Court Disposition
First question and first branch of second question answered in the affirmative; remaining questions unnecessary or abandoned.
Orders
- Residue of the estate to be paid immediately and equally to Mrs Rutherford and Mrs Bywater.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment