Searoy's Trustees v. Searoy and Others [1907] ScotLR 536 (14 March 1907)
The residue of the estate vested at the testator's death in the families of John Searcy and William Brown, subject to defeasance if the testator's daughter left issue. The division was per stirpes between the two families and per capita within each family. 'Family' was confined to immediate issue. The fact that the destination-over was in a separate clause did not alter the application of vesting subject to defeasance.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotLR 536
- Parties
- Pursuers/trustees: John Watt and others (Searoy's Trustees); Claimant and Reclaimer: Albert John Allbuary (executor of Mrs Elizabeth Carpenter or Allbuary); Claimants: Trustees of Mrs Mary Ann Ella Searcy or Murray; Claimants: Arthur John Searcy, Mrs Maud Ann Searcy or Physick, Mrs Edith Rebecca Searcy or Dickson; Claimants: Trustees of William Frederick Searcy; Claimants: John William Searcy and his Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Multiplepoinding and Exoneration (succession/trust) / Appeal (inner House, First Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled and new interlocutor pronounced.
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Subject to Defeasance, Division Per Stirpes or Per Capita, Interpretation of 'family' in Testamentary Dispositions, Intestacy, Construction of Testamentary Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Watt and others (Searoy's Trustees)
Pursuers/trustees
Albert John Allbuary (executor of Mrs Elizabeth Carpenter or Allbuary)
Claimant and Reclaimer
Trustees of Mrs Mary Ann Ella Searcy or Murray
Claimants
Arthur John Searcy, Mrs Maud Ann Searcy or Physick, Mrs Edith Rebecca Searcy or Dickson
Claimants
Trustees of William Frederick Searcy
Claimants
John William Searcy and his Guardian
Claimants
Procedural Posture
Multiplepoinding and Exoneration (succession/trust) / Appeal (inner House, First Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether vesting of the residue occurred at the testator's death subject to defeasance or was postponed until the death of the liferentrix
- 2 Whether division among 'families' was per stirpes or per capita
- 3 Whether 'family' includes grandchildren or only immediate issue
Ratio Decidendi
The residue of the estate vested at the testator's death in the families of John Searcy and William Brown, subject to defeasance if the testator's daughter left issue. The division was per stirpes between the two families and per capita within each family. 'Family' was confined to immediate issue. The fact that the destination-over was in a separate clause did not alter the application of vesting subject to defeasance.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled and new interlocutor pronounced.
Orders
- Find that vesting of the fee of the residue took place at the testator's death in the families of John Searcy and William Brown, subject to defeasance.
- Find that the one-half share of residue destined to the family of William Brown falls to Albert John Allbuary as executor of Mrs Elizabeth Carpenter or Allbuary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment