Agnew v. Scott Lithgow Ltd & Ors [2002] ScotCS 95 (5th April, 2002)
Pursuer was aware by end of 1995 of significant disability, its connection to employment, and identity of defenders; failed to establish it was not reasonably practicable to become aware of material facts before June 1996; action is time-barred under Section 17(2); no equitable grounds to exercise discretion under Section 19A.
- Citation
- [2002] ScotCS 95
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Agnew; Defenders: Scott Lithgow Limited and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages / Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Action dismissed as time-barred.
- Legal Topics
- Vibration White Finger, Prescription and Limitation (scotland) Act 1973, Time Bar, Section 17(2), Section 19 a, Constructive Knowledge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Agnew
Pursuer
Scott Lithgow Limited and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages / Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuer's action is time-barred under Section 17(2) of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
- 2 Whether court should exercise discretion under Section 19A to allow action to proceed
Ratio Decidendi
Pursuer was aware by end of 1995 of significant disability, its connection to employment, and identity of defenders; failed to establish it was not reasonably practicable to become aware of material facts before June 1996; action is time-barred under Section 17(2); no equitable grounds to exercise discretion under Section 19A.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed as time-barred.
Orders
- Sustain defenders' second plea-in-law
- Repel pursuer's third and fourth pleas-in-law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment