Gorrie v Marist Brothers [2001] ScotCS 288 (26 November 2001)
The amendment to introduce vicarious liability is a reformulation of the pursuer's case and is allowed. The Marist Brothers are properly convened as defenders in their descriptive name as an unincorporated association. The pursuer has pleaded a sufficiently relevant case for the application of section 19A, and a preliminary proof is required to determine whether it is equitable to allow the action to proceed despite being time-barred.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 288
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Michael Gorrie; Defenders and Appellants: The Marist Brothers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal on Amendment and Time Bar
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; amendment permitted; preliminary proof ordered on time-bar; certain averments excluded from probation; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Prescription and Limitation (scotland) Act 1973, Unincorporated Associations, Sexual Abuse Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Gorrie
Pursuer and Respondent
The Marist Brothers
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal on Amendment and Time Bar
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer may amend pleadings to introduce vicarious liability after expiry of limitation period
- 2 Whether the Marist Brothers are properly convened as defenders given their status as an unincorporated association
- 3 Whether it is equitable under section 19A of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 to allow the action to proceed despite being time-barred
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment to introduce vicarious liability is a reformulation of the pursuer's case and is allowed. The Marist Brothers are properly convened as defenders in their descriptive name as an unincorporated association. The pursuer has pleaded a sufficiently relevant case for the application of section 19A, and a preliminary proof is required to determine whether it is equitable to allow the action to proceed despite being time-barred.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; amendment permitted; preliminary proof ordered on time-bar; certain averments excluded from probation; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Record opened up and amended per Minute of Amendment and Answers as adjusted
- Record closed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment