DRUMMOND COX v. DUNDEE CITY COUNCIL [2014] ScotCS CSOH_3 (16 January 2014)
The defenders' employee failed to conduct an adequate risk assessment, resulting in the use of an unsuitable training area with frozen and uneven ground, which presented an obvious risk of injury. The defenders are vicariously liable for the pursuer's injury sustained as a result.
- Citation
- [2014] CSOH 3
- Parties
- Pursuer: Drummond Cox; Defender: Dundee City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Risk Assessment, Sports Injury, Duty of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Drummond Cox
Pursuer
Dundee City Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders are vicariously liable for the pursuer's injury sustained during a rugby training course due to inadequate risk assessment of underfoot conditions.
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders' employee failed to conduct an adequate risk assessment, resulting in the use of an unsuitable training area with frozen and uneven ground, which presented an obvious risk of injury. The defenders are vicariously liable for the pursuer's injury sustained as a result.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the pursuer
Orders
- Defenders found vicariously liable for damages.
- Defenders ordered to pay the agreed sum of £30,000 to the pursuer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment