DBAK against The Governors of the Fettes Trust (Court of Session) [2026] CSOH 5 (29 January 2026)
The court found the pursuer suffered PTSD for approximately two years as a result of the abuse, but the acute symptoms diminished before he left school. While the abuse affected his junior school education, the evidence did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that but for the abuse he would have obtained the qualifications necessary for a business management degree and a higher-earning career. The pursuer was awarded solatium of £40,000 (with interest), but claims for patrimonial loss (past/future wage and pension loss) were not established.
- Citation
- [2026] CSOH 5
- Parties
- Pursuer: DBAK; Defender: The Governors of the Fettes Trust
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (sexual Abuse, Damages) / Judgment After Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Decree for the pursuer for solatium and interest only; patrimonial loss claims refused.
- Legal Topics
- Vicarious Liability, Sexual Abuse, Damages Assessment, Psychiatric Injury, Loss of Earnings, Solatium, Interest on Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DBAK
Pursuer
The Governors of the Fettes Trust
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (sexual Abuse, Damages) / Judgment After Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer suffered PTSD as a result of abuse
- 2 Whether the abuse caused diminished educational and occupational attainment
- 3 Appropriate quantum for solatium and patrimonial loss
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the pursuer suffered PTSD for approximately two years as a result of the abuse, but the acute symptoms diminished before he left school. While the abuse affected his junior school education, the evidence did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that but for the abuse he would have obtained the qualifications necessary for a business management degree and a higher-earning career. The pursuer was awarded solatium of £40,000 (with interest), but claims for patrimonial loss (past/future wage and pension loss) were not established.
Court Disposition
Decree for the pursuer for solatium and interest only; patrimonial loss claims refused.
Orders
- Award of solatium: £40,000 (allocated £35,000 past, £5,000 future)
- Interest on past solatium: £57,604
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment