William Baird & Co., Ltd v. M'Whinnie [1908] ScotLR 338 (17 January 1908)
A workman cannot claim compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 for periods when he is earning wages equal to or greater than his pre-accident average weekly earnings. The right to compensation subsists only during incapacity, and the employer's tender of the statutory difference satisfies the obligation. The agreement cannot be enforced to produce a result exceeding statutory entitlement.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 338
- Parties
- Employer/complainer/respondent: William Baird & Company, Limited; Workman/charger/reclaimer/applicant: John M'Whinnie
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Suspension (appeal/reclaiming Motion) / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session (appeal From Lord Ordinary)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed; charge suspended simpliciter.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Master and Servant, Statutory Interpretation, Suspension of Charge, Variation of Compensation Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Baird & Company, Limited
Employer/complainer/respondent
John M'Whinnie
Workman/charger/reclaimer/applicant
Procedural Posture
Suspension (appeal/reclaiming Motion) / Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session (appeal From Lord Ordinary)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a workman can claim compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 during periods when he is earning wages equal to or exceeding his pre-accident earnings.
- 2 Whether the employer is liable to pay compensation at the agreed rate when the workman is no longer totally incapacitated.
- 3 Whether the agreement for compensation can be enforced without variation by court or further agreement when circumstances change.
Ratio Decidendi
A workman cannot claim compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 for periods when he is earning wages equal to or greater than his pre-accident average weekly earnings. The right to compensation subsists only during incapacity, and the employer's tender of the statutory difference satisfies the obligation. The agreement cannot be enforced to produce a result exceeding statutory entitlement.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary affirmed; charge suspended simpliciter.
Orders
- Charge for compensation suspended simpliciter.
- Employers entitled to expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment