Aldin v. Stewart [1915] ScotLR 49 (27 October 1915)
The pursuer, having de facto recovered compensation from his employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, is statutorily barred from maintaining an action for damages against the third party, regardless of his knowledge, intention, or minority.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 49
- Parties
- Pursuer: Hugh M'Donald Aldin; Defender: R. W. Stewart
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages for Personal Injuries / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; second plea-in-law for defender sustained.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Election of Remedies, Bar to Action, Master and Servant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh M'Donald Aldin
Pursuer
R. W. Stewart
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Personal Injuries / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) Against Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether receipt of compensation from employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 bars a subsequent action for damages against a third party
- 2 Whether ignorance of legal rights or minority affects the statutory bar under section 6(1)
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer, having de facto recovered compensation from his employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, is statutorily barred from maintaining an action for damages against the third party, regardless of his knowledge, intention, or minority.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; second plea-in-law for defender sustained.
Orders
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled
- Second plea-in-law for defender sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment