Fraser and Others v. Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Co., Ltd [1918] ScotLR 138 (21 December 1918)
The Court held that in assessing compensation for partial dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, evidence regarding the possible future earnings of the deceased is competent and admissible. The arbitrator should consider such evidence and give it appropriate weight in determining a sum reasonable and proportionate to the injury to the dependants.
- Citation
- [1918] ScotLR 138
- Parties
- Appellants: John Fraser and others; Respondents: Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1918
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 / Inner House, Court of Session (appeal From Sheriff Substitute at Glasgow)
- Outcome
- Determination of the arbitrator recalled; case remitted for reconsideration in light of admissibility of evidence of future earnings.
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Partial Dependency, Assessment of Compensation, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Fraser and others
Appellants
Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, Limited
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration Under Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 / Inner House, Court of Session (appeal From Sheriff Substitute at Glasgow)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence of possible future earnings of the deceased is admissible in assessing compensation for partial dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that in assessing compensation for partial dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906, evidence regarding the possible future earnings of the deceased is competent and admissible. The arbitrator should consider such evidence and give it appropriate weight in determining a sum reasonable and proportionate to the injury to the dependants.
Court Disposition
Determination of the arbitrator recalled; case remitted for reconsideration in light of admissibility of evidence of future earnings.
Orders
- The Court refused to answer the questions of law as stated.
- The determination of the Sheriff-Substitute and arbitrator is recalled in hoc statu.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment