Perth General Station Committiee v. Stewart [1924] ScotLR 606 (18 July 1924)
The Sheriff-Substitute was functus officio after final judgment in the common law action and had no jurisdiction to assess compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906; the subsequent proceedings and award were ultra vires and void, and the employers were not barred from seeking reduction.
- Citation
- [1924] ScotLR 606
- Parties
- Pursuer: Perth General Station Committee; Defender: James Stewart
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1924
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Reduction / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) to Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- decree of reduction granted; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled
- Legal Topics
- Workmen's Compensation, Jurisdiction, Reduction of Awards, Timeousness of Applications, Bar by Personal Exception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perth General Station Committee
Pursuer
James Stewart
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Reduction / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) to Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff-Substitute had jurisdiction to assess compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 after final judgment in the common law action.
- 2 Whether the employers were barred by personal exception from seeking reduction of the compensation award.
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff-Substitute was functus officio after final judgment in the common law action and had no jurisdiction to assess compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1906; the subsequent proceedings and award were ultra vires and void, and the employers were not barred from seeking reduction.
Court Disposition
decree of reduction granted; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled
Orders
- The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary is recalled.
- Decree of reduction is granted, setting aside the Sheriff Court proceedings and award of compensation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment