INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS AND INQUIRIES (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDEN DEATH OF JAMES WILLIAM THOMSON [2010] ScotSC 52 (12 February 2010)
James William Thomson died as a result of injuries sustained when a canister of expanding foam exploded due to over-pressurisation from exposure to excessive heat. There was no evidence of manufacturing defect, unsafe system of work, or reasonable precaution that could have prevented the accident or death. The precise cause of the excessive heat exposure could not be determined.
- Citation
- [2010] ScotSC 52
- Parties
- Deceased: James William Thomson (deceased); Widow/interested Party: Mrs Karen Thomson; Employer/interested Party: Dennis Thomson Builders Limited; Retailer/interested Party: Bostik Limited; Manufacturer/interested Party: Polypag AG
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination After Full Evidentiary Hearing
- Outcome
- No determination of fault or liability; death caused by workplace accident with undetermined cause of excessive heat exposure to canister.
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Accident, Product Safety, Employer Liability, Manufacturing Standards, Causation of Death
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James William Thomson (deceased)
Deceased
Mrs Karen Thomson
Widow/interested Party
Dennis Thomson Builders Limited
Employer/interested Party
Bostik Limited
Retailer/interested Party
Polypag AG
Manufacturer/interested Party
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination After Full Evidentiary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 What caused the explosion of the canister leading to the death of James William Thomson?
- 2 Were there any reasonable precautions whereby the accident or death might have been avoided?
- 3 Were there any defects in any system of working which contributed to the death or accident?
Ratio Decidendi
James William Thomson died as a result of injuries sustained when a canister of expanding foam exploded due to over-pressurisation from exposure to excessive heat. There was no evidence of manufacturing defect, unsafe system of work, or reasonable precaution that could have prevented the accident or death. The precise cause of the excessive heat exposure could not be determined.
Court Disposition
No determination of fault or liability; death caused by workplace accident with undetermined cause of excessive heat exposure to canister.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment