Jenkins v The Maersk Company Ltd [2001] ScotCS 193 (27 July 2001)

Jenkins v The Maersk Company Ltd [2001] ScotCS 193 (27 July 2001)

The pursuer failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the accident occurred as alleged. The absence of contemporaneous records, medical documentation, and credible supporting evidence undermined his claim. The defenders' evidence was preferred, and no breach of duty or statutory regulation was established.

Citation
[2001] ScotCS 193
Parties
Pursuer: Philip Jenkins; Defenders: The Maersk Company Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
27 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Proof Before Answer
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Workplace Injury, Manual Handling, Accident Reporting, Contributory Negligence
Tort Employment Law Health and Safety Workplace Injury Manual Handling Accident Reporting Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Philip Jenkins

Pursuer

The Maersk Company Limited

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Proof Before Answer

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Did the alleged accident on or about 26 August 1993 occur as claimed by the pursuer?
  2. 2 Did the defenders breach their duty to provide a safe system of work?
  3. 3 Was there suppression of accident reporting by the defenders?

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the accident occurred as alleged. The absence of contemporaneous records, medical documentation, and credible supporting evidence undermined his claim. The defenders' evidence was preferred, and no breach of duty or statutory regulation was established.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed