Craigie v. Lanarkshire Health Board & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSOH_118 (30 August 2005)

Craigie v. Lanarkshire Health Board & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSOH_118 (30 August 2005)

The defenders failed to ensure the pavement was salted or gritted immediately after snow clearance, which was reasonably practicable and would have prevented the formation of ice. This breach of statutory and common law duties caused the pursuer's accident.

Citation
[2005] ScotCS CSOH_118
Parties
Pursuer: Jean Craigie; Defender: Lanarkshire Health Board; Third Party: Prospect Healthcare (Hairmyres) Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
30 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Outcome
Decree for pursuer with reduction for contributory negligence
Legal Topics
Workplace Safety, Employer Liability, Contributory Negligence, Statutory Duty Under Workplace (health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean Craigie

Pursuer

Lanarkshire Health Board

Defender

Prospect Healthcare (Hairmyres) Limited

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial)

  1. 1 Whether the defenders breached statutory and common law duties regarding workplace safety
  2. 2 Whether the accident was caused by failure to salt/grit the pavement
  3. 3 Whether contributory negligence applies

Ratio Decidendi

The defenders failed to ensure the pavement was salted or gritted immediately after snow clearance, which was reasonably practicable and would have prevented the formation of ice. This breach of statutory and common law duties caused the pursuer's accident.

Court Disposition

Decree for pursuer with reduction for contributory negligence

Orders

  • Defenders to pay £6,000 to pursuer with interest at judicial rate from date of decree
  • Defenders liable in expenses occasioned by amendment