King v. University Of St Andrews [2005] ScotCS CSIH_43 (03 June 2005)

King v. University Of St Andrews [2005] ScotCS CSIH_43 (03 June 2005)

The pursuer's pleadings failed to specify any substantive challenge to the detailed grounds for dismissal set out by the defenders. In the absence of such specification, the defenders' pleadings are relevant and sufficient, and the pursuer's action is irrelevant and must be dismissed.

Citation
[2005] ScotCS CSIH_43
Parties
Pursuer and Reclaimer: Peter King; Defenders and Respondents: University Court of the University of St Andrews
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
03 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil (employment, Breach of Contract) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
Outcome
Reclaiming motion refused; action dismissed.
Legal Topics
Wrongful Dismissal, Breach of Employment Contract, Procedural Fairness, Good Cause for Termination
Employment Law Contract Law Wrongful Dismissal Breach of Employment Contract Procedural Fairness Good Cause for Termination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter King

Pursuer and Reclaimer

University Court of the University of St Andrews

Defenders and Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil (employment, Breach of Contract) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defenders had 'good cause' to terminate the pursuer's employment under Clause 4 of the contract
  2. 2 Whether the pursuer's pleadings were sufficiently specific to challenge the grounds for dismissal

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer's pleadings failed to specify any substantive challenge to the detailed grounds for dismissal set out by the defenders. In the absence of such specification, the defenders' pleadings are relevant and sufficient, and the pursuer's action is irrelevant and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Reclaiming motion refused; action dismissed.

Orders

  • Pursuer's reclaiming motion refused.
  • Defenders' motion to dismiss the action granted.