AIRD Geomatics Ltd & Ors v Stevenson & Anor [2015] ScotCS CSOH_57 (14 May 2015)
The recall of the interim interdict raises a conclusive presumption that it was wrongfully obtained, and the pursuers have no defence to the merits of the counterclaim; proof is restricted to quantum of damages.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_57
- Parties
- Pursuers: Aird Geomatics Limited and Others; First Defender: Richard Stevenson; Second Defenders: Carney Contracts Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Decree on Counterclaim After Abandonment of Principal Action
- Outcome
- Summary decree granted on merits of counterclaim; proof restricted to quantum of damages.
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Interdict, Summary Decree, Damages for Interim Interdict, Recall of Interdict, Employment Contract Breach
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aird Geomatics Limited and Others
Pursuers
Richard Stevenson
First Defender
Carney Contracts Limited
Second Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Decree on Counterclaim After Abandonment of Principal Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether recall of interim interdict is conclusive proof that it was wrongfully obtained
- 2 Whether pursuers have a defence to the merits of the counterclaim for damages for wrongful interdict
Ratio Decidendi
The recall of the interim interdict raises a conclusive presumption that it was wrongfully obtained, and the pursuers have no defence to the merits of the counterclaim; proof is restricted to quantum of damages.
Court Disposition
Summary decree granted on merits of counterclaim; proof restricted to quantum of damages.
Orders
- First defender's first plea-in-law in counterclaim sustained
- Pursuers' first and second pleas repelled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment