A.B. v. MENTAL HEALTH TRIBUNAL FOR SCOTLAND & MS MARGARET COOPER & DR SALLY WINNING [2011] ScotSC 179 (17 November 2011)
The Tribunal did not err in law in granting the compulsory treatment order; sufficient evidence supported the necessity of the order, and the procedure adopted by the Sheriff Principal did not compromise justice or the integrity of the Tribunal's decision-making.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotSC 179
- Parties
- Appellant: AB; First Respondent: Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland; Second Respondent: Ms Margaret Cooper; Third Respondent: Dr Sally Winning
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Treatment Order, Appeal Procedure, Judicial Ethics
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Appellant
Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland
First Respondent
Ms Margaret Cooper
Second Respondent
Dr Sally Winning
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law in granting a compulsory treatment order
- 2 Whether the procedure adopted by the Sheriff Principal was appropriate
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's members were influenced by additional materials
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law in granting the compulsory treatment order; sufficient evidence supported the necessity of the order, and the procedure adopted by the Sheriff Principal did not compromise justice or the integrity of the Tribunal's decision-making.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- Appellant liable to first and third respondents in expenses, liability modified to nil
- Appeal certified as suitable for junior counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment