Petition of Galloway Without Pylons for Judicial Review (Court of Session) [2026] CSOH 24 (10 March 2026)
Scottish Ministers provided sufficient reasons for departing from the reporters' recommendation, explaining the greater weight attached to the need for and benefits of the proposed development, and adequately addressed relevant evidence and representations; no error of law or failure to consider material matters was established.
- Citation
- [2026] CSOH 24
- Parties
- Petitioner: Galloway Without Pylons; First Respondent: Scottish Ministers; Interested Party: SP Transmission plc
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition refused
- Legal Topics
- Adequacy of Reasons, Planning Permissions, Electricity Infrastructure, Environmental Impact Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Galloway Without Pylons
Petitioner
Scottish Ministers
First Respondent
SP Transmission plc
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Scottish Ministers provided adequate reasons for departing from reporters' recommendation
- 2 Whether relevant evidence and representations were properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
Scottish Ministers provided sufficient reasons for departing from the reporters' recommendation, explaining the greater weight attached to the need for and benefits of the proposed development, and adequately addressed relevant evidence and representations; no error of law or failure to consider material matters was established.
Court Disposition
petition refused
Orders
- plea-in-law for Scottish Ministers sustained
- fourth plea-in-law for SPT sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment