PROCURATOR FISCAL AGAINST NEIL HUMPHRIES [2014] ScotSC 31 (02 June 2014)
Privilege over solicitor/client communications was waived because the accused made the incriminating statement in the presence of the complainer, who had a contrary interest in the case. This constituted an implied waiver of confidentiality, rendering the evidence admissible.
- Citation
- [2014] ScotSC 31
- Parties
- Prosecution: Procurator Fiscal; Accused: Neil Humphries
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial (trial Within a Trial on Admissibility of Evidence)
- Outcome
- Objection to admissibility of evidence overruled; evidence admitted.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Solicitor Client Privilege, Waiver of Privilege, Confession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Procurator Fiscal
Prosecution
Neil Humphries
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial (trial Within a Trial on Admissibility of Evidence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statements made by the accused during a solicitor/client meeting are protected by privilege and thus inadmissible as evidence
- 2 Whether the presence of the complainer at the meeting constituted a waiver of privilege by the accused
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege over solicitor/client communications was waived because the accused made the incriminating statement in the presence of the complainer, who had a contrary interest in the case. This constituted an implied waiver of confidentiality, rendering the evidence admissible.
Court Disposition
Objection to admissibility of evidence overruled; evidence admitted.
Orders
- The complainer's evidence of the accused's putative confession is admitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment