Laidlaw and Others (Robertson's Trustees), v. Petitioners [1908] ScotLR 139 (21 November 1908)
The Court authorised the advance to the elder son as he was unable to maintain himself, relying on the trust-disposition's discretionary power and the Court's nobile officium.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 139
- Parties
- Petitioners: John Pinkerton Laidlaw and others (Robertson's Trustees); Beneficiary: James Sangster Robertson; Beneficiary: Robert Black Robertson; Widow: Jane Black or Robertson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Advance to Beneficiary, Nobile Officium, Alimentary Annuity, Vesting of Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Pinkerton Laidlaw and others (Robertson's Trustees)
Petitioners
James Sangster Robertson
Beneficiary
Robert Black Robertson
Beneficiary
Jane Black or Robertson
Widow
Procedural Posture
Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees may advance funds to major beneficiaries out of their prospective share before vesting
- 2 Whether the Court may exercise its nobile officium to authorise such advance
Ratio Decidendi
The Court authorised the advance to the elder son as he was unable to maintain himself, relying on the trust-disposition's discretionary power and the Court's nobile officium.
Court Disposition
petition granted in part
Orders
- Authorise trustees to advance £150 per annum to James Sangster Robertson out of surplus income or capital so long as he is unable suitably to maintain himself.
- Direct trustees to deduct advances from the share ultimately coming to James Sangster Robertson without charging interest, deducted from the first portion of capital paid or set aside for him.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment