APPEAL BY RF IN THE CAUSE AF v RF [2017] ScotSAC Civ 18 (2 March 2017)

APPEAL BY RF IN THE CAUSE AF v RF [2017] ScotSAC Civ 18 (2 March 2017)

The court found that the sheriff did not err in law or fact and the original determination of financial provision was fair and reasonable.

Citation
[2017] ScotSAC Civ 18
Parties
Applicant: AF; Respondent: RF
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
02 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Divorce, Financial Provision, Appeal Procedure
Family Law Divorce Financial Provision Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AF

Applicant

RF

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff erred in determining financial provision on divorce
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be allowed

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sheriff did not err in law or fact and the original determination of financial provision was fair and reasonable.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is refused. The sheriff's decision stands.