TL, Re Application for Judicial Review of an Age Assessment [2011] ScotCS CSOH_98 (07 June 2011)
The interim order sought is too broad and problematic, effectively amounting to a declaratory order with wide implications; the prima facie case is not strong enough and the balance of convenience weighs heavily against granting the application at this time.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSOH_98
- Parties
- Petitioner: T L; First Respondent: Angus Council; Second Respondent: Glasgow City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interim Application for Order Pending First Hearing
- Outcome
- motion refused
- Legal Topics
- Age Assessment, Asylum Seekers, Interim Orders, Local Authority Duties, Child Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T L
Petitioner
Angus Council
First Respondent
Glasgow City Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interim Application for Order Pending First Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim order should be granted to treat the petitioner as a child pending judicial review of age assessment
- 2 Whether the age assessment process was compliant with legal standards
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours the petitioner
Ratio Decidendi
The interim order sought is too broad and problematic, effectively amounting to a declaratory order with wide implications; the prima facie case is not strong enough and the balance of convenience weighs heavily against granting the application at this time.
Court Disposition
motion refused
Orders
- Petition to be served on Advocate General for Scotland and Lord Advocate
- Case to be put out By Order before first hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment