Urquhart & Anor v Sweeney & Anor [2001] ScotCS 157 (20 June 2001)
The appeal was incompetent as leave to appeal from the sheriff principal was required and not obtained; no sufficient excuse was provided for this procedural failure, and the circumstances did not warrant exercise of the court's discretion to remit the cause.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 157
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Hugh McBain Urquhart; Pursuer/respondent: Mrs. Deanna Urquhart; Defender/appellant: Owen James Sweeney; Defender/appellant: Larkin Brae Horse Farm Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session
- Outcome
- appeal refused as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Agricultural Tenancy, Right of Access, Summary Decree, Leave to Appeal, Competency of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh McBain Urquhart
Pursuer/respondent
Mrs. Deanna Urquhart
Pursuer/respondent
Owen James Sweeney
Defender/appellant
Larkin Brae Horse Farm Limited
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal to the Court of Session was competent without leave from the sheriff principal
- 2 Whether summary decree was properly granted in respect of declaratory craves
- 3 Whether summary decree for interdict was properly granted
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was incompetent as leave to appeal from the sheriff principal was required and not obtained; no sufficient excuse was provided for this procedural failure, and the circumstances did not warrant exercise of the court's discretion to remit the cause.
Court Disposition
appeal refused as incompetent
Orders
- motion to dispense with Rule of Court 23.3(3) granted
- appeal refused as incompetent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment