Inglis' Trustee v. Inglis [1924] ScotLR 153 (17 January 1924)
The Court determined that, in view of the bankrupt's circumstances—including his dependants and available income—£300 per annum constituted the excess of suitable aliment, and this sum should be paid to the trustee for creditors, rather than the £400 fixed by the Sheriff-Substitute.
- Citation
- [1924] ScotLR 153
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Peter Lyle, Trustee on the sequestrated estates of Quentin Godfrey Inglis; Defender/appellant: Quentin Godfrey Inglis
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 1924
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; excess fixed at £300 per annum instead of £400
- Legal Topics
- Alimentary Provision, Excess Income, Sequestration, Maintenance of Bankrupt, Distribution to Creditors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Lyle, Trustee on the sequestrated estates of Quentin Godfrey Inglis
Pursuer/respondent
Quentin Godfrey Inglis
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the alimentary provision received by the bankrupt exceeds a suitable amount for his maintenance in view of his existing circumstances
- 2 What sum, if any, should be paid over to the trustee in bankruptcy as excess alimentary provision
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that, in view of the bankrupt's circumstances—including his dependants and available income—£300 per annum constituted the excess of suitable aliment, and this sum should be paid to the trustee for creditors, rather than the £400 fixed by the Sheriff-Substitute.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; excess fixed at £300 per annum instead of £400
Orders
- The bankrupt is ordered to pay £300 per annum from his alimentary income to the trustee for creditors, reserving the right of either party to apply for alteration in the event of changed circumstances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment