Rack Straw v. Douglas and Others [1919] ScotLR 253 (05 February 1919)
The amendment to add the pursuer's title as assignee was competent under the Act of Sederunt, as the action was commenced under a bona fide mistake and the Court has discretion to allow such amendment to avoid unnecessary procedure and expense.
- Citation
- [1919] ScotLR 253
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: John George Hay Rackstraw; Defenders and Respondents: Miss Elizabeth Bryce Douglas and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 1919
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; amendment allowed subject to payment of expenses; proof allowed on pursuer's right as assignee.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Instance, Title to Sue, Assignation, Entail, Competency of Amendment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John George Hay Rackstraw
Pursuer and Reclaimer
Miss Elizabeth Bryce Douglas and others
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendment of the instance to add pursuer's title as assignee after action raised is competent under Act of Sederunt
- 2 Whether pursuer has title to sue as assignee of a nearer heir of entail
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment to add the pursuer's title as assignee was competent under the Act of Sederunt, as the action was commenced under a bona fide mistake and the Court has discretion to allow such amendment to avoid unnecessary procedure and expense.
Court Disposition
Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; amendment allowed subject to payment of expenses; proof allowed on pursuer's right as assignee.
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor
- Remit to Lord Ordinary to allow amendment of instance to add pursuer's title as assignee, conditional on payment of certain expenses to defenders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment