The Summerlee Iron Co., Ltd v. Caledonian Railway Co. [1911] ScotLR 536 (28 January 1911)
It is competent under section 2(g) of the Act of Sederunt 1907 to allow an amendment to pleadings to add an alternative claim for damages where the original remedy of specific implement may become impossible due to supervening circumstances, as this serves to determine the real question in controversy between the parties.
- Citation
- [1911] ScotLR 536
- Parties
- Pursuer: The Summerlee Iron Company, Limited; Defender: Caledonian Railway Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Amendment of Summons
- Outcome
- Amendment allowed
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Competency of Remedies, Act of Sederunt 1907 Section 2(g)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Summerlee Iron Company, Limited
Pursuer
Caledonian Railway Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Amendment of Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it competent to amend the summons to add an alternative conclusion for damages when specific implement may not be obtainable?
- 2 Does section 2(g) of the Act of Sederunt 1907 permit such an amendment?
Ratio Decidendi
It is competent under section 2(g) of the Act of Sederunt 1907 to allow an amendment to pleadings to add an alternative claim for damages where the original remedy of specific implement may become impossible due to supervening circumstances, as this serves to determine the real question in controversy between the parties.
Court Disposition
Amendment allowed
Orders
- Record to be amended in terms of the minutes for the parties
- Proof allowed of respective averments bearing on the alternative conclusion of damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment