MacRobert v Cahill [2001] ScotCS 181 (5 July 2001)
The proposed amendments sought to introduce new cases and averments that were not previously part of the pleadings, were brought too late, and were not relevant or sufficiently specified. The opportunity to amend was restricted to a specific matter, which was not properly addressed in the proposed amendments. Therefore, the motion to amend was refused.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 181
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: David J. C. MacRobert; Defender and Appellant: James William Cahill
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Motion to Amend Pleadings and Grounds of Appeal
- Outcome
- motion to amend refused; appeal to proceed on existing pleadings and grounds of appeal
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Removal Action, Executry Estate, Judicial Factor, Late Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David J. C. MacRobert
Pursuer and Respondent
James William Cahill
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion to Amend Pleadings and Grounds of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be allowed to amend pleadings and grounds of appeal to introduce new cases and averments at a late stage
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments are relevant to the issues in the action
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendments sought to introduce new cases and averments that were not previously part of the pleadings, were brought too late, and were not relevant or sufficiently specified. The opportunity to amend was restricted to a specific matter, which was not properly addressed in the proposed amendments. Therefore, the motion to amend was refused.
Court Disposition
motion to amend refused; appeal to proceed on existing pleadings and grounds of appeal
Orders
- Appeal to proceed on present pleadings and grounds of appeal as previously amended.
- Appeal to be put out for early disposal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment