Stevens v. Motherwell Entertainments, Ltd and Another [1914] ScotLR 818 (16 July 1914)
The amendment should be allowed to ensure the real question in controversy is determined, but only on condition that the reclaimers pay the respondent's taxed expenses since the closing of the record within one month.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotLR 818
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Cousin Stevens; Defender: Motherwell Entertainments Limited; Defender: Robert Colburn Buchanan
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Reclaiming Motion (appeal) After Proof and Decree
- Outcome
- amendment allowed on condition of payment of expenses
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Record, Expenses, Court of Session (scotland) Act 1868, Printing of Notes of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Cousin Stevens
Pursuer
Motherwell Entertainments Limited
Defender
Robert Colburn Buchanan
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Reclaiming Motion (appeal) After Proof and Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendment of the record should be allowed after proof and decree
- 2 Whether failure to print notes of evidence with reclaiming note is fatal to the reclaiming motion
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment should be allowed to ensure the real question in controversy is determined, but only on condition that the reclaimers pay the respondent's taxed expenses since the closing of the record within one month.
Court Disposition
amendment allowed on condition of payment of expenses
Orders
- Amendment to record allowed on condition defenders pay pursuer within one month the taxed expenses incurred since closing of record
- Remit account of expenses to Auditor to tax or report
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment