Qamar, Re appeal against a determination [2004] ScotCS 76 (16 March 2004)

Qamar, Re appeal against a determination [2004] ScotCS 76 (16 March 2004)

The adjudicator's findings, based on credible evidence, established a real risk of arrest and treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR. The Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in law by disregarding these findings on unreasonable grounds. The appeal is allowed and the adjudicator's decision restored.

Citation
[2004] ScotCS 76
Parties
Applicant: Amir Qamar; Respondents: The Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
16 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Paragraph 24 of Schedule 4 to the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 / Appeal Against Immigration Appeal Tribunal Determination
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Deportation, Article 3 ECHR, Risk of Torture, Wednesbury Unreasonableness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amir Qamar

Applicant

The Immigration Appeal Tribunal

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Paragraph 24 of Schedule 4 to the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 / Appeal Against Immigration Appeal Tribunal Determination

  1. 1 Whether the appellant faces a real risk of arrest and treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR if deported to Pakistan
  2. 2 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in law by overturning the adjudicator's findings

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator's findings, based on credible evidence, established a real risk of arrest and treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR. The Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in law by disregarding these findings on unreasonable grounds. The appeal is allowed and the adjudicator's decision restored.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • decision of the adjudicator restored