ANDREW JACKSON v PROCURATOR FISCAL, PERTH [2016] ScotSAC Crim 1 (13 January 2016)

ANDREW JACKSON v PROCURATOR FISCAL, PERTH [2016] ScotSAC Crim 1 (13 January 2016)

The court determined that bail should not be granted due to the risk of absconding and public safety concerns.

Citation
[2016] ScotSAC Crim 1
Parties
Appellant: Andrew Jackson; Respondent: Procurator Fiscal, Perth
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
13 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Jackson

Appellant

Procurator Fiscal, Perth

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal

  1. 1 whether bail should be granted pending appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that bail should not be granted due to the risk of absconding and public safety concerns.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • bail refused