Nelson, Re Note Of Appeal Against Sentence [2007] ScotHC HCJAC_31 (08 May 2007)
The sheriff erred in applying paragraph 60 instead of paragraph 42 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Schedule; as no person under 18 was involved, the appellant should not have been placed on the Sex Offenders Register.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] ScotHC HCJAC_31
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrew James Nelson; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Public Indecency, Sexual Offences Register, Sentencing, Sexual Offences Act 2003
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew James Nelson
Appellant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should have been placed on the Sex Offenders Register for an offence of public indecency
Ratio Decidendi
The sheriff erred in applying paragraph 60 instead of paragraph 42 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Schedule; as no person under 18 was involved, the appellant should not have been placed on the Sex Offenders Register.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Entry on the Sex Offenders Register quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment