Logan v. Scottish Water [2005] ScotCS CSIH_73 (01 November 2005)
The court held that the appellant's loss of development value did not arise by reason of the exercise of the sewerage authority's statutory powers under section 3 of the Sewerage (Scotland) Act 1968, but rather from the refusal of planning permission. The Tribunal was correct in law to reject the claims for development value and ransom value, as neither loss was directly caused by the statutory powers. The Tribunal had no power to award interest on compensation. The only compensation due was a nominal sum for the ongoing presence of pipes in the appellant's land.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSIH_73
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrew Logan; Respondent: Scottish Water
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Stated Case Under Section 20(2) of the Sewerage (scotland) Act 1968 / Appeal From Lands Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in respect of development and ransom value claims; nominal compensation affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Statutory Interference, Causation and Remoteness in Statutory Claims, Loss of Development Value, Ransom Value Claims, Interpretation of Sewerage (scotland) Act 1968 Section 20
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Logan
Appellant
Scottish Water
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stated Case Under Section 20(2) of the Sewerage (scotland) Act 1968 / Appeal From Lands Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether loss of development value was caused by exercise of statutory powers under section 3 of the Sewerage (Scotland) Act 1968
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to compensation for loss of development value or ransom value under section 20 of the 1968 Act
- 3 Whether the Tribunal had power to award interest on compensation
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the appellant's loss of development value did not arise by reason of the exercise of the sewerage authority's statutory powers under section 3 of the Sewerage (Scotland) Act 1968, but rather from the refusal of planning permission. The Tribunal was correct in law to reject the claims for development value and ransom value, as neither loss was directly caused by the statutory powers. The Tribunal had no power to award interest on compensation. The only compensation due was a nominal sum for the ongoing presence of pipes in the appellant's land.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in respect of development and ransom value claims; nominal compensation affirmed.
Orders
- Appellant not entitled to compensation for loss of development value or ransom value under section 20 of the 1968 Act.
- Tribunal has no power to award interest on compensation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment