Argo v. Pauline and Others [1905] ScotLR 43_23 (10 November 1905)
The phrase 'my relatives of like degree in Scotland living at the time of my death' in the codicil refers to relatives who were settled or ordinarily resident in Scotland at the time of the testatrix's death, not those merely present temporarily. Miss Annie Elmslie, whose home and ordinary residence was in Australia and who was only visiting Scotland, did not qualify.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 43_23
- Parties
- Pursuer: Gavin E. Argo; Appellant: Annie Elmslie; Claimant (withdrew Appeal): Isabella Janet Elmslie; Respondents: Pauline and Others (29 claimants)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Multiplepoinding (succession Dispute) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; interlocutor of the Sheriff affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Bequest, Class Description in Will, Residency Requirement for Beneficiaries, Expenses in Multiplepoinding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gavin E. Argo
Pursuer
Annie Elmslie
Appellant
Isabella Janet Elmslie
Claimant (withdrew Appeal)
Pauline and Others (29 claimants)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Multiplepoinding (succession Dispute) / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a relative temporarily present in Scotland at the testatrix's death qualifies as 'in Scotland' under the will's bequest
- 2 Proper construction of the phrase 'my relatives of like degree in Scotland living at the time of my death'
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase 'my relatives of like degree in Scotland living at the time of my death' in the codicil refers to relatives who were settled or ordinarily resident in Scotland at the time of the testatrix's death, not those merely present temporarily. Miss Annie Elmslie, whose home and ordinary residence was in Australia and who was only visiting Scotland, did not qualify.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; interlocutor of the Sheriff affirmed.
Orders
- Refuse the appeal.
- Affirm the interlocutor of the Sheriff dated 3rd February 1905.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment