Peat v. Peat's Trustees [1901] ScotLR 38_269 (15 January 1901)
The annuity was a preferable charge upon the corpus of the trust estate, payable out of income or capital as necessary. Trustees were entitled to recover advances made to cover annuity deficiency and trust expenses from beneficiaries before conveying specific legacies.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_269
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Alexander Peat; Defenders/appellants: Peat's Trustees
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Dispute / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal sustained; defenders assoilzied (absolved) with expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Annuity, Preferential Charge, Specific Legacy, Trustee Expenses, Distribution of Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Peat
Pursuer/respondent
Peat's Trustees
Defenders/appellants
Procedural Posture
Succession Dispute / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees can demand repayment from capital for advances made to cover annuity deficiency
- 2 Whether annuity is a preferable charge on corpus of estate
- 3 Whether specific legacies are subject to trust expenses and annuity payments
Ratio Decidendi
The annuity was a preferable charge upon the corpus of the trust estate, payable out of income or capital as necessary. Trustees were entitled to recover advances made to cover annuity deficiency and trust expenses from beneficiaries before conveying specific legacies.
Court Disposition
Appeal sustained; defenders assoilzied (absolved) with expenses.
Orders
- Defenders entitled to expenses as between agent and client in both courts.
- Defenders authorised to charge all expenses incurred since 30 November 1899 against trust estate before accounting to pursuer, as taxed by Auditor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment