Kilcoyne v. Wilson [1906] ScotLR 44_61 (22 November 1906)
The duty to initial adjustments to the record by the Sheriff remains in force and was not complied with; therefore, the record was not in proper form and the appeal process was irregular, requiring the case to be remitted to the Sheriff to regularise the record.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 44_61
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Anthony Kilcoyne; Defender and Respondent: James Wilson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court for Jury Trial / Competency Objection at Inner House, Single Bills
- Outcome
- appeal sustained in part; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; cause remitted to Sheriff to allow parties to adjust and to initial adjustments
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Competency, Adjustment of Record, Duty to Initial Adjustments, Failure to Print Adjustments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Kilcoyne
Pursuer and Appellant
James Wilson
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court for Jury Trial / Competency Objection at Inner House, Single Bills
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal is competent where adjustments to the record were not printed and not initialed by the Sheriff as required by Act of Sederunt 1839
Ratio Decidendi
The duty to initial adjustments to the record by the Sheriff remains in force and was not complied with; therefore, the record was not in proper form and the appeal process was irregular, requiring the case to be remitted to the Sheriff to regularise the record.
Court Disposition
appeal sustained in part; interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute recalled; cause remitted to Sheriff to allow parties to adjust and to initial adjustments
Orders
- Recall interlocutor of Sheriff-Substitute dated 23rd October 1906
- Remit cause to Sheriff to allow parties to adjust and to initial adjustments in terms of Act of Sederunt 1839
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment