Burrell v. Van T' Hoff [1915] ScotLR 651 (12 May 1915)
Strict compliance with the Act of Sederunt regarding time and manner of lodging appeal papers and printing requirements is required, but in view of established lax practice and undertakings to correct errors, non-compliance was excused in this instance and the appeal allowed to proceed.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 651
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Henry Burrell; Defender and Respondent: Cornelis Van t' Hoff
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court / Interlocutory Ruling on Competency Objections Prior to Hearing on Merits
- Outcome
- Objections to competency repelled; appeal allowed to proceed to the roll.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Compliance With Court Rules, Printing Requirements, Office Hours for Filing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry Burrell
Pursuer and Appellant
Cornelis Van t' Hoff
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court / Interlocutory Ruling on Competency Objections Prior to Hearing on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether depositing appeal papers after office hours but within the fourteenth day complies with Act of Sederunt 1913, D iii, 2
- 2 Whether use of smaller-than-required type in printed papers invalidates the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Strict compliance with the Act of Sederunt regarding time and manner of lodging appeal papers and printing requirements is required, but in view of established lax practice and undertakings to correct errors, non-compliance was excused in this instance and the appeal allowed to proceed.
Court Disposition
Objections to competency repelled; appeal allowed to proceed to the roll.
Orders
- Allow the record tendered on 15th April to be received.
- Appoint the cause to be put to the roll.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment