NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL v. ALISTAIR McMEEKIN [2013] ScotSC 97 (20 December 2013)
The appeal court refused to allow amended grounds of appeal as they bore no relation to pleadings or evidence led before the sheriff, would require substantial amendment and new evidence, and were raised late despite ample opportunity for legal advice. The interests of justice did not warrant reopening the proof or allowing new grounds at this stage.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 97
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: North Lanarkshire Council; Defender/appellant: Alistair McMeekin
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Application / Appeal Against Sheriff's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Personal Bar, Statutory Obligations, Assessment of Care Charges, Prescription
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Lanarkshire Council
Pursuer/respondent
Alistair McMeekin
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Summary Application / Appeal Against Sheriff's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amended grounds of appeal should be allowed after proof and judgment
- 2 Whether the obligation to pay care charges was extinguished by prescription
- 3 Whether reassessment of care contributions post-death was lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal court refused to allow amended grounds of appeal as they bore no relation to pleadings or evidence led before the sheriff, would require substantial amendment and new evidence, and were raised late despite ample opportunity for legal advice. The interests of justice did not warrant reopening the proof or allowing new grounds at this stage.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- refused to allow amended grounds of appeal to be received
- refused defender's motion to allow Note of Appeal to be received late
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment