Levy v. Jackson [1903] ScotLR 40_832 (16 July 1903)
Neither the Act to Amend the Law concerning Games and Wagers 1845 nor the Gaming Act 1892 applies to Scotland, as their provisions, terminology, and enforcement mechanisms are exclusively tailored to England and Ireland, with no adaptation or reference to Scottish law or procedure.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_832
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Charles Levy; Defender/reclaimer: John Jackson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (recovery of Sums Advanced in Betting Transactions) / Inner House Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; court adhered to Lord Ordinary's decision
- Legal Topics
- Applicability of English Gaming Statutes to Scotland, Enforceability of Betting Contracts, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Levy
Pursuer/respondent
John Jackson
Defender/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (recovery of Sums Advanced in Betting Transactions) / Inner House Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Do the Act to Amend the Law concerning Games and Wagers 1845 (8 and 9 Vict. c. 109) and the Gaming Act 1892 (55 Vict. c. 9) apply to Scotland?
- 2 Is a claim for sums advanced in betting transactions recoverable in Scotland under statute or common law?
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the Act to Amend the Law concerning Games and Wagers 1845 nor the Gaming Act 1892 applies to Scotland, as their provisions, terminology, and enforcement mechanisms are exclusively tailored to England and Ireland, with no adaptation or reference to Scottish law or procedure.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; court adhered to Lord Ordinary's decision
Orders
- Neither the Act to Amend the Law concerning Games and Wagers 1845 nor the Gaming Act 1892 applies to Scotland.
- The pursuer's action is not excluded by these statutes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment