Scottish Forestry (Whether request was manifestly unreasonable) [2025] ScotIC 274_2025 (10 November 2025)

The Commissioner determined whether the request met the threshold of being manifestly unreasonable and applied the statutory test to the facts of the case.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] ScotIC 274_2025
Parties: Respondent: Scottish Forestry; Applicant: Applicant
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judgment Date: 10 November 2025
Procedural Posture: Information Rights Appeal / Decision
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Manifestly Unreasonable Request, Freedom of Information

Information Law Administrative Law Manifestly Unreasonable Request Freedom of Information

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Scottish Forestry

Respondent

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Information Rights Appeal / Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the information request was manifestly unreasonable under the relevant freedom of information legislation

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner determined whether the request met the threshold of being manifestly unreasonable and applied the statutory test to the facts of the case.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.