Douglas & Co. v. Stiven [1900] ScotLR 37_412 (02 February 1900)
An arbitration clause referring to the 'customary manner of the timber trade' is valid and enforceable under the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894, as evidence established a prevailing custom of reference to two arbiters and an oversman, and such a clause is sufficiently certain for the court to enforce.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_412
- Parties
- Pursuer: Douglas & Company; Defender: James Stiven
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract/arbitration) / Interlocutory Appeal (reclaiming Note) on Arbitration Clause
- Outcome
- Action sisted (stayed) pending arbitration in terms of the contract; finding as to the customary manner of arbitration pronounced.
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Clause Interpretation, Custom of Trade, Proof of Custom, Arbitration (scotland) Act 1894
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas & Company
Pursuer
James Stiven
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/arbitration) / Interlocutory Appeal (reclaiming Note) on Arbitration Clause
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a reference to arbitration 'in the customary manner of the timber trade' is sufficiently certain to be enforceable under the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894
- 2 What level of proof is required to establish a trade custom expressly referred to in a contract
Ratio Decidendi
An arbitration clause referring to the 'customary manner of the timber trade' is valid and enforceable under the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894, as evidence established a prevailing custom of reference to two arbiters and an oversman, and such a clause is sufficiently certain for the court to enforce.
Court Disposition
Action sisted (stayed) pending arbitration in terms of the contract; finding as to the customary manner of arbitration pronounced.
Orders
- Find that the customary manner of settling disputes by arbitration in the timber trade is by each party choosing an arbiter, with power to appoint an oversman.
- Sist the action until the matters in dispute have been determined by arbitration in terms of the contract.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment