Ansari, Re Judicial Review [2015] ScotCS CSOH_168 (11 December 2015)
The Haney duty under article 5 ECHR is imposed on the state in its capacity as detainer and is not a free-standing duty applicable to local authorities. Local authorities, while public bodies with statutory responsibilities in rehabilitation and throughcare, do not detain prisoners and are not required to justify deprivation of liberty under article 5. Any duties owed by local authorities arise from specific statutes, not from Haney or article 5. Therefore, the petitioner's case against the first respondents (local authority) is irrelevant and must be refused.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_168
- Parties
- Petitioner: Yousef Ansari; First Respondent: Aberdeen City Council; Second Respondent: Scottish Ministers; First Interested Party: Police Scotland
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Opinion on Preliminary Issue (scope of Duty Under Article 5 Echr)
- Outcome
- petition refused as against the first respondents (Aberdeen City Council)
- Legal Topics
- Article 5 ECHR, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Duties of Local Authorities, Haney Duty, Throughcare Responsibilities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yousef Ansari
Petitioner
Aberdeen City Council
First Respondent
Scottish Ministers
Second Respondent
Police Scotland
First Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Opinion on Preliminary Issue (scope of Duty Under Article 5 Echr)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Haney duty under article 5 ECHR apply to local authorities as well as the Scottish Ministers?
- 2 What is the scope of any such duty if it exists?
Ratio Decidendi
The Haney duty under article 5 ECHR is imposed on the state in its capacity as detainer and is not a free-standing duty applicable to local authorities. Local authorities, while public bodies with statutory responsibilities in rehabilitation and throughcare, do not detain prisoners and are not required to justify deprivation of liberty under article 5. Any duties owed by local authorities arise from specific statutes, not from Haney or article 5. Therefore, the petitioner's case against the first respondents (local authority) is irrelevant and must be refused.
Court Disposition
petition refused as against the first respondents (Aberdeen City Council)
Orders
- Petition refused as against the first respondents.
- Case appointed to come out By Order to determine further procedure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment