Pentland-Clark v. MacFie [2004] ScotCS 165 (02 July 2004)
The pursuer had no title to raise the action at the time due to assignation of her rights; the action was premature and unnecessary, warranting award of expenses against the pursuer.
- Citation
- [2004] ScotCS 165
- Parties
- Pursuer: Joan Pentland-Clark; First Defender: John H. MacFie W. S.; Second Defender: Gordon Innes W. S.
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motion Roll; Determination of Expenses Following Resolution of Substantive Issues
- Outcome
- Defenders assoilzied from conclusions; expenses awarded against pursuer.
- Legal Topics
- Assignation of Rights, Judicial Factor, Expenses, Premature Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joan Pentland-Clark
Pursuer
John H. MacFie W. S.
First Defender
Gordon Innes W. S.
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion Roll; Determination of Expenses Following Resolution of Substantive Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuer had title to sue at the time of raising the action due to assignation of rights
- 2 Whether action against second defender was properly convened
- 3 Entitlement to expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer had no title to raise the action at the time due to assignation of her rights; the action was premature and unnecessary, warranting award of expenses against the pursuer.
Court Disposition
Defenders assoilzied from conclusions; expenses awarded against pursuer.
Orders
- Procedure Roll Diet discharged
- Defenders assoilzied from conclusions of the Summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment