EG, Re Application for Judicial Review [2011] ScotCS CSOH_97 (07 June 2011)
The omission to consider the specific non-availability of Darunavir in Zimbabwe was not material, as the petitioner could not satisfy the high threshold established in N v United Kingdom for health-related Article 3 ECHR claims. The Border Agency's determination was lawful and properly concluded that there was no realistic prospect of success before an Immigration Judge.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotCS CSOH_97
- Parties
- Pursuer: E G; Defender: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Health Related Removal, Fresh Claim Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E G
Pursuer
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defender
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Border Agency's determination that further submissions did not amount to a fresh claim under Rule 353 was lawful
- 2 Whether removal of the petitioner to Zimbabwe would breach Article 3 ECHR due to health grounds
Ratio Decidendi
The omission to consider the specific non-availability of Darunavir in Zimbabwe was not material, as the petitioner could not satisfy the high threshold established in N v United Kingdom for health-related Article 3 ECHR claims. The Border Agency's determination was lawful and properly concluded that there was no realistic prospect of success before an Immigration Judge.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- petitioner's plea repelled
- respondent's plea sustained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment