Brock v. Brock [1908] ScotLR 858 (12 June 1908)
A witness to a deed need not have prior personal knowledge of the testator if credible information is provided at the time of execution and the testator acknowledges the signature; thus, the statutory requirements for attestation were satisfied and the codicil could not be set aside on this ground.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 858
- Parties
- Pursuer (respondent): Alexander Brock; Defender (reclaimer): John Brock
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Decree of Reduction
- Outcome
- interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled; defender assoilzied (absolved)
- Legal Topics
- Attestation of Wills, Witness Knowledge of Testator, Statutory Requirements for Execution of Deeds, Forgery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Brock
Pursuer (respondent)
John Brock
Defender (reclaimer)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Decree of Reduction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the codicil was invalid due to alleged forgery of the testator's signature
- 2 Whether the execution of the codicil was defective under Act 1681, c. 5, due to insufficient knowledge of the testator's identity by a witness
Ratio Decidendi
A witness to a deed need not have prior personal knowledge of the testator if credible information is provided at the time of execution and the testator acknowledges the signature; thus, the statutory requirements for attestation were satisfied and the codicil could not be set aside on this ground.
Court Disposition
interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary recalled; defender assoilzied (absolved)
Orders
- Decree of reduction on the ground of forgery recalled
- Defender assoilzied (absolved)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment