STATED CASE APPEAL v CONVICTION BY BAIJUN LIU v PF STIRLING [2024] ScotSAC Crim 5 (23 April 2024)
The court held that the sheriff was entitled to convict on the facts found in the stated case and that there was no miscarriage of justice.
- Citation
- [2024] ScotSAC Crim 5
- Parties
- Appellant: Baijun Liu; Respondent: PF Stirling
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Stated Case Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Conviction, Appeal Procedure, Stated Case
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Baijun Liu
Appellant
PF Stirling
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Stated Case Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of Baijun Liu was correct in law based on the facts stated in the case.
- 2 Whether there was a miscarriage of justice in the conviction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the sheriff was entitled to convict on the facts found in the stated case and that there was no miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
appeal refused
Orders
- conviction affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment