BH, APPEAL BY BH AND EH v CH AND SM [2019] ScotSAC CIV 7 (27 February 2019)

BH, APPEAL BY BH AND EH v CH AND SM [2019] ScotSAC CIV 7 (27 February 2019)

The sheriff did not err in law and properly considered the welfare of the child; the appeal is refused.

Citation
[2019] ScotSAC CIV 7
Parties
Appellant: BH; Appellant: EH; Respondent: CH; Respondent: SM
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
27 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal
Outcome
appeal refused
Legal Topics
Contact Orders, Child Welfare, Appeal Procedure
Family Law Contact Orders Child Welfare Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BH

Appellant

EH

Appellant

CH

Respondent

SM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sheriff erred in law in refusing contact between the appellants and the child
  2. 2 Whether the welfare of the child was properly considered

Ratio Decidendi

The sheriff did not err in law and properly considered the welfare of the child; the appeal is refused.

Court Disposition

appeal refused

Orders

  • The appeal is refused.