Gibson v. Blair [1918] ScotLR 300 (27 February 1918)
The action was incompetent because it was raised before any default had occurred; the interest was not yet due, and no statutory demand for repayment had been made. The creditor's rights do not extend to instituting proceedings for recovery before the debt is payable, absent insolvency or sequestration.
- Citation
- [1918] ScotLR 300
- Parties
- Pursuer: William Gibson; Defender: John Sloan Blair
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 1918
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; action dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Bond and Disposition in Security, Maills and Duties, Default, Prematurity of Action, Titles to Land Consolidation (scotland) Act 1868
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Gibson
Pursuer
John Sloan Blair
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a creditor can raise an action of maills and duties before interest on a bond is due and payable
- 2 Whether the absence of default or statutory demand renders such action incompetent
Ratio Decidendi
The action was incompetent because it was raised before any default had occurred; the interest was not yet due, and no statutory demand for repayment had been made. The creditor's rights do not extend to instituting proceedings for recovery before the debt is payable, absent insolvency or sequestration.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; action dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- Court adhered to the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary dismissing the action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment