ALEX MURRAY v. COMPETENCE MATTERS LTD [2013] ScotSC 108 (14 November 2013)
The pursuer was entitled to bonus payments under the contract, the pleadings and evidence did not establish an admission of variation, the sheriff properly exercised discretion in allowing amendment, and the pursuer proved quantum for 255 candidates. Interest at 8% per annum from citation was awarded.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotSC 108
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Alex Murray; Defenders and Appellants: Competence Matters Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Appeal refused, cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Bonus Entitlement, Variation of Contract, Quantum of Damages, Interest on Judgment, Pleadings and Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alex Murray
Pursuer and Respondent
Competence Matters Limited
Defenders and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuer was entitled to contractual bonus payments
- 2 Whether contract was varied to remove bonus entitlement
- 3 Whether pursuer established quantum of completed candidates
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer was entitled to bonus payments under the contract, the pleadings and evidence did not establish an admission of variation, the sheriff properly exercised discretion in allowing amendment, and the pursuer proved quantum for 255 candidates. Interest at 8% per annum from citation was awarded.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused, cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- Sheriff's interlocutor of 27 June 2013 adhered to
- Interlocutor amended to award interest at 8% per annum from date of citation until paid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment