MAST GROUP LIMITED AGAINST PATRICIA CHALMERS [2022] ScotCS CSOH_43 (25 May 2022)
The bonus scheme was to be interpreted as providing for an arithmetical calculation based on all sales in the territory, not limited to products existing or budgeted as of October 2019, and not requiring proof of personal achievement of sales by Ms Chalmers. However, the scheme excluded bonus entitlement for sales of capital instruments sold below list price, as per the scheme's terms.
- Citation
- [2022] ScotCS CSOH_43
- Parties
- Pursuer: MAST GROUP LIMITED; Defender: PATRICIA CHALMERS
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Defender's counterclaim upheld in part; pursuer's action dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Bonus Entitlement, Employment Contract Interpretation, Implied Terms, Personal Bar, Sales Commission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAST GROUP LIMITED
Pursuer
PATRICIA CHALMERS
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bonus scheme entitled Ms Chalmers to a bonus on sales of Covid-19 related products
- 2 Whether the bonus scheme was limited to products existing or budgeted as of October 2019
- 3 Whether Ms Chalmers was entitled to a bonus on sales of capital instruments sold below list price
Ratio Decidendi
The bonus scheme was to be interpreted as providing for an arithmetical calculation based on all sales in the territory, not limited to products existing or budgeted as of October 2019, and not requiring proof of personal achievement of sales by Ms Chalmers. However, the scheme excluded bonus entitlement for sales of capital instruments sold below list price, as per the scheme's terms.
Court Disposition
Defender's counterclaim upheld in part; pursuer's action dismissed.
Orders
- Decree of absolvitor granted in principal action.
- Decree for payment by pursuer to defender of £245,274.75.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment