MAST GROUP LIMITED AGAINST PATRICIA CHALMERS [2022] ScotCS CSOH_43 (25 May 2022)

MAST GROUP LIMITED AGAINST PATRICIA CHALMERS [2022] ScotCS CSOH_43 (25 May 2022)

The bonus scheme was to be interpreted as providing for an arithmetical calculation based on all sales in the territory, not limited to products existing or budgeted as of October 2019, and not requiring proof of personal achievement of sales by Ms Chalmers. However, the scheme excluded bonus entitlement for sales of capital instruments sold below list price, as per the scheme's terms.

Citation
[2022] ScotCS CSOH_43
Parties
Pursuer: MAST GROUP LIMITED; Defender: PATRICIA CHALMERS
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
25 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Proof Before Answer
Outcome
Defender's counterclaim upheld in part; pursuer's action dismissed.
Legal Topics
Bonus Entitlement, Employment Contract Interpretation, Implied Terms, Personal Bar, Sales Commission

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MAST GROUP LIMITED

Pursuer

PATRICIA CHALMERS

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Proof Before Answer

  1. 1 Whether the bonus scheme entitled Ms Chalmers to a bonus on sales of Covid-19 related products
  2. 2 Whether the bonus scheme was limited to products existing or budgeted as of October 2019
  3. 3 Whether Ms Chalmers was entitled to a bonus on sales of capital instruments sold below list price

Ratio Decidendi

The bonus scheme was to be interpreted as providing for an arithmetical calculation based on all sales in the territory, not limited to products existing or budgeted as of October 2019, and not requiring proof of personal achievement of sales by Ms Chalmers. However, the scheme excluded bonus entitlement for sales of capital instruments sold below list price, as per the scheme's terms.

Court Disposition

Defender's counterclaim upheld in part; pursuer's action dismissed.

Orders

  • Decree of absolvitor granted in principal action.
  • Decree for payment by pursuer to defender of £245,274.75.