Steel v Young [1907] ScotCS CSIH_4 (11 January 1907)
The pursuer materially breached the contract by substituting milled lime for cement mortar without the defender's authorisation; such a deviation is not a mere matter of detail and bars recovery of the contract price.
- Citation
- [1907] ScotCS CSIH_4
- Parties
- Pursuer: Steel; Defender: Young
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Building Contract Dispute / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; defender assoilzied (absolved)
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Building Contracts, Performance of Contract, Remedies for Breach
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Steel
Pursuer
Young
Defender
Procedural Posture
Building Contract Dispute / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's use of milled lime instead of cement mortar constituted a breach of contract
- 2 Whether the architect was authorised by the defender to approve the substitution
- 3 What remedy, if any, is available to the pursuer after a material deviation from the contract
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer materially breached the contract by substituting milled lime for cement mortar without the defender's authorisation; such a deviation is not a mere matter of detail and bars recovery of the contract price.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; defender assoilzied (absolved)
Orders
- Interlocutor of the Sheriff-substitute affirmed with variation
- Pursuer's claim for contract balance dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment